Nicky K D Chaleunphone is an IDIOT

Nicky K D Chaleunphone likes to make all manner of unfounded comments about me and what my sex is, then from time to time the little wanker manages to say something true, I am not intersex, like him I am male.

Nicky is male because he has male genitalia. I have seen pictures of his genitals, he kindly made them available, so I can say for certain he is a man. He’s not a very nice man, he’s not a very smart man, he’s not a very good looking man either, unless your eyes behold more than mine?

Nicky the Bigot

Now remember this blog is supposed to be about Kallmann syndrome, which Nicky K D Chaleunphone is supposed to have. Kallmann syndrome affects both males and females so one must ask how on earth can it be an intersex condition? Like CAH also affects both males and females, so how can that be intersex too?

Anyway, the intersex grouping of people, well it’s their business, if they want to include or exclude anybody, for any reason, it’s not really a concern of mine as I’m not intersex. The reason Nicky K D Chaleunphone hates all Transsexual people is because he is Asian. I was surprised to discover that Asian’s generally regard Transsexual people as not real men and not real women. Even though Nicky K D Chaleunphone wasn’t raised in Asia, only born in Asia, his parents were. They took with them to America their culture of hatred and raised him to hate. This is why Nicky never has a nice thing to say about anybody.

XXY Boys should not be referred to as having Klinefelter’s syndrome

For parents out there, your children are children, this fact seems to be lost on many parents, thinking of a related matter I read a couple of days ago. I read of a mother who described her sons penis as a ‘doodle.’ I think children can get their minds and tongue around ‘penis’ more easily than ‘doodle.’ Maybe the mother does’t refer to her sons penis as a ‘doodle’ to him, maybe she was just nervous about mentioning the correct word where she was? People confident to talk about sex have no problem referring to sex organs of both sexes by their correct name, wherever they are.

Children are learning, and I know you all know that, and their first teachers are their parents, I know you all know that too. So if your son is prenatally diagnosed XXY and you decide to keep him, not kill him, I think it would be an excellent idea to learn up on genetics. Not just go along with whatever the prevailing attitude is. Actually think about it, with an analytical, mature, mind.

Go to my previous post if you want links, you can find out all you need to know there when it comes to what Klinefelter’s syndrome is, and how it got it’s name.

Bearing in mind that Klinefelter’s syndrome is the SYMPTOMS of a DISEASE, not a DISEASE in itself. So when are you parents likely to notice your XXY son is developing the beginnings of Klinefelter’s syndrome?

According to common knowledge Klinefelter’s syndrome is seen in very young boys, even babies, and there is nothing the parent can do about it. There’s a nice defeatist attitude, saves having to think about what you’re doing and and why. You’re just observers of your sons predictable life, as you’ve read about other XXY boys who appear the same. That they have 44 unique autosomes and 3 unique sex chromosomes means absolutely nothing to you. Like when you walk down the street and see other men and women you think to yourselves how all just like YOU they are!

The additional X is mostly inactivated. It’s mostly inactivated in everybody with more than 1 X chromosome, that’s all you XX mothers out there too. You can’t resign from the study of genetics just because you’re a mother. So if we look at XXX females, what SYMPTOMS of DISEASE are they named after? It must have slipped my mind, I am XXY after all and I do have a poor short term memory. Maybe I can blame that extra X? Or Klinefelter’s syndrome – the symptoms of a disease? Or my parents for me having a poor short term memory?

Getting back to XXX females, it turns out they do have noticeable educational difficulty, fancy that! They seem to have growth issues too, being slightly taller than average females, in childhood. At puberty they’re fertile, they don’t have interference in their cells preventing the development of complete puberty, and interference of their ovaries to release eggs. They don’t develop soon after the onset of puberty hypergonadtropic hypogonadism or hypogonadtropic hypogonadism. They don’t have any kind of hypogonadism. I think it’s proven, the additional X can have an effect on education and growth regardless of the sex of the person with the additional X.

So those growth issues you parents see in your XXY sons before puberty have nothing to do with Klinefelter’s syndrome, and everything to do with the fact that there is an additional X, but not in every XXY boy. In fact if you decided you could find all XXY boys by karyotyping all tall boys, you’d miss most XXY boys. Most boys who are taller than average have normal sex chromosomes. But by karyotyping ALL boys you’d find ALL XXY and XYY boys, and ALL XX boys, and ALL XXXY boys, and ALL XXXXY boys, and every other variation there is.

So why is it then that some XXY boys are more affected than others? That might have something to do with their parents? For some reason every time I chat with parents of XXY boys they all seem to assume they’re the ‘bees knees’ of parents. How can that be when they have usually never trained to be parents before they were parents? Like most parents who discover they have a child who’s different, they have to learn how to care for that child. I don’t read how the parents of these XXY boys took themselves off to parenting classes after the diagnosis. They always seem to want to be involved in genetic counselling for themselves, and be involved with support groups to compare notes with other parents, and console themselves that they’ve done nothing wrong, and never could.

Curiously Dr Johannes Nielsen (deceased) in Denmark found that of all the XXY boys who did poorly in school, who had behaviour and educational difficulty, and ‘brushes with the law’, all came from poor parenting homes. Other XXY boys who experienced educational difficulty, and emotional disturbance, were assisted by sensible parents, and their children did not end up ‘before the courts’ as they say. Parents do have a lot to do with the way in which their XXY boys learn and communicate, and their progression to adulthood.

Did I mention the 44 unique autosomes and 3 unique sex chromosomes? Oh yes I did. They all came from their parents, the genetic providers. Are the genetic providers related to all the other genetic providers of all the other XXY boys on the planet? Are all XXY males the offspring of the same family of incestuous genetic providers? I would find that somewhat hard to believe, (makes great science fiction though.) So we all have different autosomes and sex chromosomes that come from different parents, so the possibility of other genetic conditions existing in an XXY boy, that are undiscovered, is just as good as anybody else having an undiscovered genetic anomaly, or maybe even better, since they all do have an additional X chromosome. Genetics is the only area where parents can be freed from responsibility, since XXY is a random event, that cannot be predicted.

The way in which genes work is that they are said to ‘express’ like the expression of a opinion. That expression has an effect somewhere else. So since all our genes are not exactly the same as any other person on the planet, it is conceivable that genes expressing to cause good memory, do not have the intended expression and the signal is interrupted by failing genes, or non existent genes. Just because we have the same shape and number of autosomes and chromosomes does not mean the same genes on that additional X are expressing in all of us, to the same degree. It could be that the most severely affected XXY boys have more genes that escape inactivation on the additional X than most XXY boys?

One way to further settle the matter is to look at a population of persons who have no sex hormone in childhood, do they have poor short term memory? Actually no, not as a group. Maybe there are individuals with Kallmann syndrome with poor short term memory, but it is not a feature of their syndrome, that they are born with, they are hypogonadal in the womb and at birth.

It seems the only time these people have difficulty is when they fail to enter puberty properly. The initial changes of puberty do start, they just fail to continue as they have hypogonadtropic hypogonadism, where the gonadtropins are not produced to tell their gonads to start working.

So if hypogonadism is the cause of all the difficulty in XXY boys before puberty’s onset, why is hypogonadism not the cause of difficulty in childhood for Kallmann syndrome people?

Well I’m convinced:

“Nobody was ever born with Klinefelter’s syndrome. XXY pre pubertal boys cannot have Klinefelter’s syndrome. Klinefelter’s syndrome is the post onset of puberty symptoms of disease XXY men and, XXY teenage boys can develop.”

XXY boys should not be referred to as having Klinefelter’s syndrome.

Kallmann and Klinefelter’s syndromes are not the same Disorders

Author G J Lentz is proposing in his new book “House of Cards” (Amazon) that Kallmann syndrome and Klinefelter’s syndrome are conjoined, as if they can be experienced by one person at the same time, which is impossible, of course and really who would want to?

Great new news, G J Lents is altering his book cover to say Kallmann and Klinefelter’s are 2 separate conditions. He’s still going to say in his book that he was diagnosed with both of them at different times, which is why I pre purchased a copy, I can’t wait to read it, but I guess I’ll have to. And he’s not very appreciative of our protests to 2 Moon Book Publishers, we did him a favour, he’d be made a laughing stock of if he published in the original format! It seems some people just don’t know what side of their bread is buttered.

“The blurb is being changed to read ARE instead of IS and CONDITIONS instead of CONDITION to reverse the inadvertent confusion. Who knew that two little words like: is and condition would cause so much ire. It should be changed, and it will be so, but doesn’t change the fact that after being told that I did not mean to nor intend claims of “having both” you consistently spread this and argue it based on context.
GJLentz 2 days ago on XXYforLIFE’s “Preview of G J Lentz’s book “House of Cards”

Yes I admit I mustered all the support I could find from Klinefelter’s support organisations and Kallmann support organisations to encourage your book’s publisher to alter the grossly misleading description of your book. For some body who wants to be taken seriously, wants I presume, to have their book purchased and read by as many as possible, I would think you’d have made sure no such confusion could exist. It is obvious whatever genetic condition it was that affected your life is a key element of your story. It just seems illogical to me that you’d not want to make sure your information was accurate. If you really do have one (or both) of these conditions, I am surprised you find the insistence for accuracy almost an unwelcome intrusion.

All the people I know with Klinefelter’s syndrome prefer accuracy, and the ‘it’s not important’ attitude that came through from some of the people on the Kallmann syndrome support group on Facebook specifically, suggests to me you never had Klinefelter’s at all. We Klinefelter’s sufferers being much maligned since 1959 with a great need to prevent the next generation from being aborted out of existence is probably the reason we are sticklers for accuracy. Some Kallmann people on the other hand, who have no concerns of abortion before they’ve breathed air, as their genetic condition is undetectable prenatally, I understand?

I hope your new book is a great success, and you go on to more and more success.

Graeme Tucker
47XXY